Export to Reference Manager
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Adaptive governance, ecosystem management, and natural capital|
|Abstract:||To gain insights into the effects of adaptive governance on natural capital, we compare three well-studied initiatives; a landscape in Southern Sweden, the Great Barrier Reef in Australia, and fish- eries in the Southern Ocean. We assess changes in natural capital and ecosystem services related to these social–ecological gover- nance approaches to ecosystem management and investigate their capacity to respond to change and new challenges. The adaptive governance initiatives are compared with other efforts aimed at conservation and sustainable use of natural capital: Natura 2000 in Europe, lobster fisheries in the Gulf of Maine, North America, and fisheries in Europe. In contrast to these efforts, we found that the adaptive governance cases developed capacity to perform ecosystem management, manage multiple ecosystem services, and monitor, communicate, and respond to ecosystem-wide changes at landscape and seascape levels with visible effects on natural capital. They enabled actors to collaborate across diverse interests, sectors, and institutional arrangements and detect opportunities and prob- lems as they developed while nurturing adaptive capacity to deal with them. They all spanned local to international levels of decision making, thus representing multilevel governance systems for man- aging natural capital. As with any governance system, internal changes and external drivers of global impacts and demands will continue to challenge the long-term success of such initiatives.|
|Journal Title:||Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|
|Appears in Collections:||Natural Resources Adelaide and Mt Lofty Ranges|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.